;
;
____________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
|
ETHICS & NORMS IN DIAMOND GRADING |
.... R & D Staff, GII, Bombay
In the olden days the diamond business was entirely based
on the personal evaluation by the jeweler. Generally jewelers used the criteria
of colour, purity and size for evaluation of diamonds. Most of the time the
buyer had absolute trust in the jeweler. As the diamond trade expanded, however,
more and more members of the public were involved in the buying and selling
of diamonds. Thus the confidence in old type of relationship ? the trust factor
? slowly began to reduce.
Laymen found it difficult to understand how the price of
the diamond could be entirely dependant on the subjective opinion of a single
individual or seller as each jeweler or diamond dealer seemed to have his
own standard of judgment. Earlier days diamond were scarce. In the course
of time diamond production started increasing. The world production of diamonds
had recorded 6 million cts. in 1913 and by 1927, 8 million cts and as on today
it is over 110 million cts. Therefore one of the established factors or rarity
for value of the gemstones disappeared in the case of diamonds since it is
produced in millions of carats. However of necessity, new rarity factors depending
upon the colour and clarity of an individual stone emerged.
Inspite of the fact that diamond still serves as a symbol of love, constancy
of success and power, the present day buyer is governed by the rational motive
oriented towards the value of the diamond he purchases. Under the circumstances,
it was necessary to evolve a more practical and consistent method for evaluation
of diamonds. This is the main reason why during the 20th century the system
for diamond grading developed, mainly emanating from USA, the largest consumer
of diamond in the world today.
The present system of diamond grading is the result of an evolution that can
be traced back almost 100 years.
Today the value of the diamond is determined by the popular dictum known as
4?C's which refer to the qualitative aspects such as clarity, colour, cut
and carat weight. There exists large number of instruments, many especially
designed, to enable graders to accurately judge the four qualities or characteristics.
 |
| |
| Copyright
©
- All rights reserved |
| |
| ORIGIN
OF GRADING STANDARDS |
Grading and classification of diamonds began in the beginning
of the 20th century based on the internal features seen in a diamond as well
as the colours of a diamond.
About 100 years back Paris was the most important trading center for diamonds.
In order to differentiate the clean diamonds from those having inclusions,
two designations were arrived at, "Pure" for cleans and "Pique"
for spotted diamonds.
Around 1920, in USA the terms like VVS, VS, SI & 1 were coined to describe
clarity grades.
Similarly colour grading is brought to be the oldest technique used for determination
of a rarity grade systematically. Even before the discovery of the rich diamond
deposits in South Africa a series of terms like Golcanda (for Indian origin),
Bagagem (for Brazilian origin) were used to characterize the colour intensity
of diamonds.
The various name of colours which originated from the then newly discovered
sources in South Africa even today are still known as the old terms. For example
"Jagar" for Jagersfontein mine. Jagar is equated with finest blue
white.
|
THE BIRTH OF CERTIFICATES |
In the year 1929 Robert Shipley having learnt gemmology
at the Gemmological Association of Great Britain, established the Gernmological
Institute of America in Los Angles in the year 1931, this started the GIA
which established its own system of grading diamonds. As the diamond trade
developed further, the early 1950's, the GIA started its first grading laboratory
in New York to analyze individual stones and issue reports on their quality.
These reports known as "grading certificates" can be recognized
to be a major turning point in the diamond industry. It has changed the entire
international diamond trade. As it was difficult to send diamonds for approval
overseas, the diamond dealers found it very convenient to get the diamond
graded, certified and mail only certificate. Only on the basis of the certificate
people could buy the diamond without actually seeing it. To sum up it can
be said that a certificate is a description of the identifying features of
and the price determining factors associated with the diamond. As a rule it
is prepared by the seller or is prepared for him by a Research Laboratory
for delivering to the buyers as a statement in writing of certain properties.
|
GRADING LABORATORIES AND
STANDARDS GIA
|
The demand for diamond certificates grew rapidly as their
authenticity was recognized. The CIA diamond grading system became well known
to the diamond industry and amongst the consuming public. Originally the colours
were described after their source. In the course of decades this system has
been superseded by an alphabet system, in which the letter U represents the
best colour quality ? River or exceptional white. The letters follow in an
alphabetical order as far as ' Z '.
For clarity grading the CIA developed a the GIA clarity system which refers
to both internal & external features of a cut diamond.
Grading of cut is of great importance and is carried out very precisely.
In Germany during the year 1935 the quality features were
codified in the form of RAL, Agreement ? the German Standard Association's
Commission on Terms of Delivery and safeguarding of quality.
In the year 1963, in the 5th edition of RAL the terms were defined for the
first time. Subsequently the RAL regulations were replaced by the new CIBJO
rules.
In the early seventies efforts were made to codify various
national grading terms for diamond by an international uniform nomenclature.
CIBJO is an International Association of the jewellery, silver, pearls and
stones; CIBJO was formed in 1961 and today it is an Association of 21 countries
which also includes India.
CIBJO consists of various sections of which a special Diamond Commission was
formed in 1971. Diamond commission put forward rules for Diamond Trade in
1974, which were adopted as binding by CIBJO.
The Laboratories practicing CIBJO rules for Diamond Grading and Certification
must be independent and impartial and should not involve in business of selling
or buying diamonds.
CIBJO together with World Federation of Diamond Bourses, (WFDB) and International
Diamond Manufacturers' Association (lDMA) founded a joint committee in 1975
with a view to workout international guidelines for judging the quality of
Diamond. From this joint committee the IDC ? International Diamond Council
emerged.
IDC's aim was to work out rules for the diamond trade which would be generally
valid and consistent throughout the world. The international rules for grading
diamonds were drawn up by IDC together with Diamond High Council (HRD) in
Antwerp.
IDC in the meanwhile founded several Laboratories in which
the work is carried out according to the International Rules for Diamond Grading.
HRD in Antwerp, National Gemmological Institute in Israel, Diamond and Gemstone
Testing Laboratory at the Diamond and Gemstone bourse in Idar Oberstein are
working as per the IDC rules.
In 1969 the countries of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden,
under the chairmanship of H. Tillander of Helsinki, presented very detailed
grading standards, which are summarized in the Scandinavian Nomenclature (Scan
D.N.)Colour and clarity grading is in conformity with the GIA standards, here
too external features are regarded as affecting the clarity. The colour terms
are completely equivalent to those of the GIA.
Larger scope is given to the cut. Cut grading is simplified by means of a
very well worked out point system. The proportions are based on those of the
Scandinavian standard Brilliant, which were arrived at mathematically by TILLANDER.
| 1. Diamond should he unmounted |
There are many individuals and private laboratories who
are issuing certificates of grading for colour and clarity for Diamonds
which are mounted in jewellery.
This is totally invalid and unethical and should
not be accepted by the Trade and General Public.
As per Article 7 of CIBJO Diamond Rules, it is a condition laid down in
unequivocal terms that the precise grading of a diamond may only be done
when the diamond is unmounted. The colour of a diamond set in a jewellery
can never be precisely judged as the shade of the metal will impair the
colour. Moreover the colour grading is not done by observing the colour
from the table. Infact it is the colour perceived from the pavilion side
is the basis of the colour grading. While the diamond is set in a jewellery
only the table is visible and the pavilion is covered by the metal.
Under the circumstances if some laboratories and individuals are issuing
a colour grading certificates for a mounted stone it would not be of much
help to the industry or consumer, but it will only misguide them besides
being totally unethical. |
|
| 2. Size of the diamonds |
The CIBJO rules very clearly stipulate that the minimum
size of a diamond certified should be of 0.47 cts. However it further
states that simplified diamond reports maybe issued for sizes between
0.20 and 0.47 cts containing statements regarding weight, colour, clarity,
purity, shape and measurements. |
|
| 3. Master stones |
A set of seven diamonds was selected graded and approved by resolution of the CIBJO Executive Committee on 27th April 1978 as the
official set of Masterstones for determining the colour. The master set
is chosen by eye as to its colour degree which represents the lower limit
of each colour. Further measurements by means of instruments will have
only indicative value. CIBJO will not accept them as determinants and
will never change the adopted series because of any results obtained by
means so instruments. National duplicates of masterstones are to be compared
and chosen equivalent to the official C113J0 set and are to be approved
by a CIBJO commission. These masterstones should only have a minimum weight
of 0.70 ct. good proportions, with none or negligible fluorescence, a
faceted or polished girdle and no coloured, black or otherwise disturbing
inclusions. The lower grade of colour should have yellow shade and not
brown. |
|
| 4. Basic aspects of certification |
Following are the fundamentals on which the certificates
are granted. They are the 4 C's.
As per the CIBJO Rules, each of these aspects are analysed and studied
by minimum of 3 qualified gemologists/graders and the majority opinion
is considered as final for issue of certificates. It is unethical for
a laboratory to issue certificates on the basis of the opinion of one
gemologists/ grader.
Therefore all the recognized laboratories in the world issue certificates
of diamond grading only after the diamonds have been graded by 3 graders. |
The international norms have decided that the weight of
diamond should be expressed in carats. In Certificate this figure should be
confined to a hundred of a carat, i.e. to the 2nd decimal place.
| COLOUR
GRADES |
| |
|
|
| GIA |
CIBJO |
Description |
| D |
Exceptional
white + |
} |
Colourless |
| E |
Exceptional
White |
} |
| |
|
|
| F |
Rare White
+ |
} |
Near
Colourless |
| G |
Rare White |
} |
| |
|
|
| H |
White |
|
| |
|
|
| I |
Slightly
tinted white |
} |
Faint
Colour |
| J |
Slightly
tinted white |
} |
| K |
Tinted white |
} |
| L |
Tinted white |
} |
| |
|
|
| M.Z.. |
Tinted |
Very light
to light colour |
In certificates the following' terms should be used as
per IDC/CIBJO recommendations and not the old terms like River to yellow.
Abbreviations are not permissible. Addition of the GIA colour grade of the
GIA colour from D to Z in recent years became necessary as trade usage.
The Diamond colours are determined by the seven CIBJO master stones. The master
stones describe the lower limit of each colour.
The colour grade of diamond is ascertained by comparing with CIBJO Master
stones set using light source of 5500 Kelvin.
The above scale is internationally accepted as CIBJO/IDC
Colour Grading Standard.
The colour grading scale is a descending scale which marks the lower limit,
for eg. at a particular colour concentration, it is established as 'H' and
above that level of colour till it reaches 'G' the colour is classified as
H and then till F it is G and so on. In other words as F colour will not be
designated as E till the time the shade crosses E. In this method the graders
keep a strict check on the grading pattern. On the other hand, some of the
private Laboratories have started issuing certificates of a higher grade as
soon as the border line is crossed. In this manner a colour better than F
on CIBJO or HRD standards may be classified by same individual grader as E.
This results in upgradation of colour which is an unhealthy trade practice.
Colour specification must be made by experienced professionals, carried out
by comparison to a master set chosen according to the original CIBJO master
stones under normalized artificial light equivalent to 5500 K. If no difference
observed between one of the master stones and the diamond to be graded, the
colour of the master stone is conclusive. If the colour lies between those
of the two master stones the colour of the darker one is conclusive. The fluorescence
of the diamond has merely a descriptive value and is expressed as:
NONE - SLIGHT - MEDIUM - STRONG as seen under 366nm long Wave UV.
As colour comparison is not recommended in day light, because
of its variable spectral colours, a suitable artificial day light source is
essential.
Bright sun light is totally unsuitable as is the light of an electric bulb.
Even the floors, carpets, walls and room furnishing should not be colored.
A special diamond room should be maintained with gray colour and windows if
possible, facing North in Northern hemisphere and to South in southern hemisphere.
One of the best colour grading lamps available today is the Dialite models
made by System Eickhorst.
The stones of comparison set are laid in a white folded paper on their table
facets, so that the stone can be observed from the side of the pavilion sideways.
Diamond under test and the comparison stones should not touch each other.
Diamond should be cleaned thoroughly before colour grading as soiled diamonds
can not be colour graded.
The international body, CIBJO, had laid down certain norms
for puritylclarity grade. Accordingly to this all crystalline, solid inclusions,
clouds, pinpoint fissures feathers, bearding, structural phenomena are termed
as inclusions. The clar of a diamond is examined by an experienced professionals
under 10x magnification.
|
CIBJO - International Clarity Scale
|
| Clarity of a diamond tested by 10x magnification
as well as achromatic, aplantic loupe. |
| FL / IF OR Loup clean |
Free from Internal characteristics / Loup
clean inclusions (internally flawless) |
| VVS (VVS 1, VVS 2) |
Very, very small inclusions |
| VS (VS 1, VS 2) |
Very small inclusions |
| SI (SI 1, SI 2) |
Small inclusions |
| 11 (Pique' 1) |
Internal characteristicstinclusions which
are prominent. |
| 12 (pique' 2) |
Internal characteristics/inclusions which
are very prominent |
| 13 (pique' 3) |
Internal characteristics/inclusions which
are extremely prominent |
External characteristics do not impair the clarity ? this
applies to polishing lines, rough edges. Bum marks, ex located damages such
as scratches, extra facets and naturals as well as twinning lines, growth
lines and grain lines.
But major external characteristics which cannot be removed by repolishing
without considerable loss of weight should be taken into account when grading
for clarity.
Inclusions in a diamond have to be studied and defined
in very clear terms. Broadly the study of inclusions for the purpose of clarity
grading is grouped as under :-
| 1. |
Size of inclusions |
| 2. |
Number of inclusions
|
| 3. |
Position of inclusions
|
| 4. |
Colour of inclusions
|
| 5. |
Nature of inclusions
|
| 6. |
Relief of inclusions |
As mentioned above clarity grading has to be done by 10x
magnification only.
The size of inclusions is measured in microns. The diamond is termed "Loupe
Clean" if it does not show any inclusions larger than 5 microns with
10x magnification.
However, it may be noted that stone cannot be graded if it is set in jewellery
as the inclusions may be covered by the metal. The clarity grading has to
be done by observing both the crown and pavilion portion of the diamond. Under
the circumstances, it is misleading and hence unethical to make a statement,
in a grading certificate, that the stone is "graded as mounting permits."
In general terms the cut of stone refer to its basic shape
eg. Round brilliant cut, marquise and baguette cut etc. However for certification
purposes, cut grading involves the analysis of the proportions and the finish
of a diamond.
Until the beginning of this century, the forrns of diamond
cut developed infinitely as men strove to obtain an optimal brilliance effect.
It is this urge of people to strive for the best combination of brilliance
and dispersion from a cut diamond that lead to the emergence of ideal cut.
Since the year 1910 theoretical calculations have been employed to measure
cut in order to obtain maximum brilliance through suitable proportions and
symmetry ratios. As such, a series of proportion symmetry ratios were developed
for cutting diamonds which were known as Ideal cut, Practical Fine cut, Parker
brilliant, Scandinavian standard brilliant etc. depending on the individual
preferences in different parts of the world. However, the most widely ?accepted
proportions the world over as of today, are those known as "Tolkowsky
Cut on the "American ideal cut" since it has optimum amount of brilliance
and dispersion possible by means of optical physical calculations.
 |
|
 |
Fig.1
Ideal cut |
|
Fig.2
Tited table |
| The symmetry faults are irregularities in
the cut during manufacturing. This involves the following: |
| 1. |
Deviation from
circular shape : This refers to unequal girdle diameter developed during
the bruting process of a rough diamond. |
| 2. |
Tilted table : A
tilted table may be evaluated if the measurement of crown height i.e.
distance between the table and girdle are different on both sides. |
| 3. |
Excentric table
: This means that the table is not in the center (off centered) and therefore
the distance from girdle to table corners is more on one side and less
on the other side.
|
| |
|

Fig.3 Fig.4
Fig.5
Excentric table
Excentric
culet Symmetry
of table edges |
| |
|
| 4. |
Excentric culet
: The culet which is the tip of the stone, should be placed in the center
of the stone. However it may not be in the center and therefore would
be known as eccentric culet. This is directly related to the inequality
of the pavilion facet angle. |
| 5. |
Symmetry of table
and table edges : The table facet should form a regular octagon i.e. all
the sides and the angles of the octagon must be the same. Sometimes we
may also find space between the table edges in which case it will not
be a perfect octagon. |
| |
|
 Fig.6 Fig.7 Fig.8
Size
of tacets Truncated
facets Thin
to extremely thick |
| |
|
| 6. |
Size of facets : It is essential also that
similar facets should be cut equal in size and regularity. Attention is
given to the intersection of edges of pavilion facets,distance of various
facets from girdle and culet. |
| 7. |
Truncated facets : One of the most common
symmetry irregularity is in the form of truncated facets. This means that,
these facets are wider than the facets which run to a point in the girdle
and especially seen in kites and bezel facets. They may also be too short.
(Fig. 7)
These norms take into account the general proportions of the stone and
following the laws of optics, allow a maximum of brilliance for the modem
cut of a diamond. |
| DESCRIPTION
OF THE GIRDLE |
Bruted - faceted - polished
Thin - medium - thick |
The finish?grades for symmetry and for polish are given
as :
Very good - good - medium - poor
External characteristics visible from the crown?side should be mentioned
in diamond reports under "comments" i.e. negligible external
characteristics, naturals, unusually open culet, growth-lines (graining)
surface grain-lines, seam (knot) lines. |
It is therefore very essential that the Diamond Grading
Certificates should be obtained from an impartial and independent Trade Laboratory
which follows the ethic and norms.
Given below are the International CIBJO approved laboratories :
| CIBJO
- LABORATORIES |
| List of Laboratories which are currently Approved
by CIBJO. |
| GII |
(Gemmological Institute of India, Bombay)
- India |
| OGG |
Vienna, Austria |
| IBGM |
Brasila, Brazil |
| BGG |
Beijing, China |
| LEG |
Paris, France |
| DDI |
Pforzheim, Germany(Diamond) |
| CISGEM |
Milan, Italy |
| JJA |
Tokyo, Japan |
| NEL (NNM) |
Leiden, Netherlands |
| IGE |
Madrid, Spain |
| SSEF |
Basel, Switzerland |
| GAGTL |
London, United Kingdom |